Grammar
Emphasis - Focussing with cleft sentences
We sometimes use constructions called cleft sentences when we want to focus on a particular part of the sentence. These are used both in written and spoken English.
There are two main types of cleft sentence, it- clefts and what- clefts (and a variation of what-clefts, all-clefts). What- clefts and variations on them are often referred to as pseudo clefts.
Read all about clefts and try some exercises.
Introduction
What a cleft sentence does is to cleave (split or divide into two) a sentence into two parts in order to emphasise one of the parts (underlined). The part of the sentence we don't want to emphasise is put into a type of relative clause (in dark blue).
Warsaw Will writes this blog. (normal sentence)
- It's Warsaw Will who writes this blog.
it-cleft - uses a type of defining relative clause
- What Warsaw Will does is write this blog.
wh-cleft - uses a type of nominal relative clause
If we want to emphasise nouns and other parts of a sentence other than finite verbs, we can use an it-cleft.
If we want to emphasise finite verbs or actions, we need to use a wh-cleft.
Update - following a comment from elhamcz I've amended the section on it-clefts a bit, adding a little more information, a bit about pronouns and an additional exercise, on it-cleft structures in questions.
What's a nominal relative clause?
A nominal relative clause is like a defining relative clause, but where the noun and relative pronoun are combined in a nominal relative pronoun, most commonly what. You can find out more about these in my post about nominal relative clauses (link below).
- This is the thing that connects the brake cable to the brake. (defining relative)
- This is what connects the brake cable to the brake. (nominal relative)
Random Idea English
http://random-idea-english.blogspot.com
Emphasis in cleft sentences with it.
By using a cleft sentence with preparatory it, we can emphasise a noun, often in contrast with what has just been said:
- I like Paris a lot, but it's Marseilles that I like the best.
The basic structure is:
It is / was + emphasised noun phrase + who / that + rest of the sentence
We often use an it-cleft to correct wrong information. When speaking, we stress the emphasised noun phrase. Note that we can stress different parts of the sentence: the subject, the object, a prepositional phrase for example.
- Jenny has bought a house in London
- No, it's Sally who/that has bought a house in London.
(emphasises the subject)
- No, it's a flat (that) Jenny bought in London.
(emphasises the object)
- Jenny went to visit her sister on Wednesday.
- No, it was on Thursday (that) she went to visit her sister.
(emphasises an adverbial of time)
- No, it's in Brighton (that) Jenny has bought a new house.
(emphasises an adverbial of place)
Notice that the use of pronouns is similar to but not exactly the same as in defining relative clauses:
- who or that for people
- that is usually used for things and after prepositional phrases
- As in defining relative clauses, who and that can be left out when they refer to the object or the object of a preposition.
See the next section for a discussion on words used to introduce the relative clause.
Relative pronouns etc in it-clefts
By far the most common pronoun used to introduce the relative clause part is that, and it is also possible to use who to refer to people. One grammar book suggests that we tend to use that after proper nouns (names), and my own feeling is that we tend to use who after pronouns:
- It was Paul that gave the game away, wasn't it?
- It's you who should be apologising, not her.
You will occasionally see other wh-words in it-clefts, but they are rather rare, and you are probably better avoiding them, especially in tests and in writing:
- which (for things)
It was his attitude which annoyed me.
more usual:
It was his attitude that annoyed me.
- whose (for possession)
It wasn't David whose pen you borrowed, you borrowed mine.
more usual is to use a possessive and that or zero pronoun
It wasn't David's pen (that) you borrowed, it was mine.
- whom (very formal, and seen by many as rather old-fashioned and stilted)
In the end it was Peter whom I asked to be my best man.
much more natural is to use who, that or perhaps best, nothing.
In the end it was Peter (that/who) I asked to be my best man.
- when, where (sometimes used in an informal style, often without a preposition)
It's Tuesday when they're coming, isn't it?
It was the Black Swan where I saw you last night, wasn't it?
When using that or nothing we may need to include a preposition
It's on Tuesday (that) they're coming, isn't it?
It was in the Black Swan (that) I saw you last night, wasn't it?
A bit more on it-clefts
In spoken English we often use tag questions after it-clefts:
- It was you who left the door open, wasn't it?
- It's tomorrow we're having an extra class, isn't it?
Sometimes we stress is/was rather than the emphasised word, when we want to confirm something we already think is probably true:
- It was you who left the door open, wasn't it?
- It is tomorrow we're having an extra class, isn't it?
We use a third person verb after who/that, agreeing with the subject:
- It's you who has just got into Oxford, isn't it? (one of you - singular)
It's you children who have hidden my glasses, isn't it? (plural)
We can also use negative structures:
- It isn't Peter who you should be blaming, but George.
- It wasn't in Bristol he made his fortune, although that's where he was born.
When the context is clear, we can miss out the relative clause part:
- A: I wonder who wrote that on the board.
B: Well, it certainly wasn't me! (who wrote that on the board)
- A:Do you know when the exhibition starts?
B: It's on Friday. (that the exhibition starts)
When we emphasise a subject pronoun, we usually use an object pronoun after is/was. In a very formal style, a subject pronoun can be used. If you want to avoid being too informal, you can use a structure with person/one:
- It's me who does all the cooking. (informal)
It is I who does all the cooking. (very formal)
I'm the person/one who does all the cooking. (neutral)
- It wasn't her who told me. (informal)
I was not she who told me. (very formal)
She's not the person/one who told me. (neutral)
Practice with it-clefts
In the it-cleft exercises only that, who and zero pronoun (nothing) are used to introduce the relative clause part.
We can also emphasise parts of the sentence (other than finite verbs), not just nouns. Again when speaking we'd stress the most important word of the stressed phrase.
Questions with it-clefts
Look at these two questions and their answers:
- Did you tell James, or did you forget?
It's OK, I told him.
- Did you tell Peter, or was it somebody else?
No, it certainly wasn't me.
In the second example, where you is stressed, and where we mean 'was it you or somebody else?', we often use an it-cleft question structure, stressing the word(s) we want to emphasise:
- Was it you who / that told Peter?
I don't know who it was, but it certainly wasn't me.
Notice that the part after who / that is in normal positive form (without do/did in simple teneses) and in the third person.
- Is it you who's just been promoted? (singular)
Is it you two who have been making so much noise? (plural)
Emphasis in cleft sentences with what.
What- clefts, also known as pseudo-clefts, have three patterns. In the first, the what-clause is usually in subject position, but it can also be a subject complement, when it is sometimes called a reversed pseudo cleft. (More about them later) Look at these sentences, then at how they are split to make what-clefts.
- Sally dumped me.
- I don't like the way she did it.
- She locked me out of the flat.
- To focus on a noun phrase, we split the sentence just before the noun phrase
what + clause + be + noun phrase
I don't like the way she did it.
What I don't like is the way she did it.
The way she did it is what I don't like. (reversed)
This pattern is often used with verbs expressing an emotion or want:
like, love, dislike, hate, enjoy, need, prefer, want, etc.
- To focus on an action done by the subject, we split the sentence just before the verb (the action), and add a form of do. Note that we might have to change the form of the verb.
what + subject + do / does / did etc + be + verb etc
Sally dumped me.
What Sally did was (to) dump me.
Sally had dumped me.
What Sally had done was (to) dump me.
- To focus on the whole event, especially an event outside the subject's control. Here the 'split' comes before the event, in other words the whole sentence.
what + happen + be + (that) + original sentence
She locked me out of the flat.
What happened was (that) she locked me out of the flat.
She has locked me out of the flat.
What has happened is (that) she has locked me out of the flat.
Note - we use was with any past tense, including past perfect, and we use is with any present tense, including present perfect.
Emphasis in cleft sentences with all.
We can also use all (meaning the only thing) instead of what in all three of the patterns we use for what-clefts.
- All I want is a room somewhere. (Wouldn't It Be Loverly from My Fair Lady)
- All Oliver Twist did was (to) ask for more.
- All that happened was (that) I broke a vase.
Random Idea English
http://random-idea-english.blogspot.com
Practice with what-clefts
Random Idea English
http://random-idea-english.blogspot.com
Random Idea English
http://random-idea-english.blogspot.com
The main difference between it-clefts and wh-clefts
Look at these sentences:
- Cezanne's use of colour astonishes the viewer (normal sentence)
- It is Cezanne's use of colour that astonishes the viewer (it-cleft)
- What astonishes the viewer is Cezanne's use of colour. (what-cleft)
In an it-cleft, the emphasis is near the beginning of the sentence. In a what-cleft, it's the end of the sentence that takes the emphasis. This is where we often prefer to put new information or a long subject.
- A group of wild horses galloping through the clearing caught our attention.
- What caught our attention was a group of wild horses galloping through the clearing.
A what-cleft can also have an announcing function; it is like answering a question we might expect our listener is wondering about. It's often used by a speaker to introduce their talk or lecture.
- Audience - I wonder what he's going to talk about.
- Speaker - What I want to talk about today is the state of the economy.
Other wh-clefts
Although what is the by far the most common, we can also in theory use other wh-words in pseudo clefts.
- What we did was (to) build a treehouse in the garden.
- Why we did it was so that the children would have somewhere interesting to play.
- Where we did it was in the big oak tree overlooking the river.
- How we did it was by first erecting a platform in the tree.
- When we did it was in the spring, before the leaves grew too much.
But apart from the what-cleft in the first sentence, these clefts starting with a simple wh-word are quite informal, and we usually prefer to use a longer expression instead.
- why - the reason (why/that) + clause + is/was + focus element
- where - the place where / that + clause + is/was + focus element
- when - the day / week / etc when / that + clause + is/was + focus element
- how - the way that + clause + is/was + focus element
- We can also use a long expression instead of what.
- what - the thing /stuff / matter etc that + clause + is/was + focus element
- Note - we can't start a cleft sentence with who. We need to say:
- the person / one who ...
These should become clearer in the next exercise.
Grammar trivia
When we use a simple wh-pronoun, we have a nominal relative clause. But when we use a 'long expression', we have a defining relative clause.
- What we need is a corkscrew. - nominal relative
- The thing (that) we need is a corkscrew. - defining relative
To-infinitives after do in pseudo clefts
Look at these example sentences from previous sections:
- What Sally did was (to) dump me.
- All Oliver Twist did was (to) ask for more.
- The best thing (that) we can do is (to) forget about it.
When we have a to-infinitive after the verb do in a pseudo cleft sentence we can leave out to. This is almost always done in North American English, and is increasingly the case in British English as well, especially in spoken language.
Random Idea English
http://random-idea-english.blogspot.com
Reversed pseudo clefts
Sometimes we might want to put the expression we are focussing on at the beginning of the sentence, in which case we can use what is known by linguists and grammarians as a reversed pseudo cleft.
Reversed pseudo clefts are not used as much as normal pseudo clefts, and can sound rather formal, except perhaps for constructions with 'the person' or something similar, which are quite common - see next section.
- He wanted to buy a new computer game. (normal sentence)
What he wanted to buy was a new computer game. (pseudo cleft)
A new computer game is what he wanted to buy. (reversed pseudo cleft)
- You need to see Diana about that. (normal sentence)
The person (who / that) you need to see about that is Diana. (pseudo cleft)
Diana is the person (who /that) you need to see about that. (reversed pseudo cleft)
- We're leaving early because of the traffic. (normal sentence)
The reason (why / that) we're leaving early is the traffic. (pseudo cleft)
The traffic is the reason (why / that) we're leaving early. (reversed pseudo cleft)
The person, one, thing etc
We can also use cleft-like structures with person or one for people:
- The person who knows all about that is Diana.
- Diana 's the one (who /that) you need to see about that.
- You've come to the right person. I'm the one who deals with all that sort of thing.
- The one (who/that) everybody's been talking about for the job is Spencer.
- Apparently you're the person (who) I need to see.
- They're the people who have invited us to dinner next week.
For things and situations, we use thing:
- The only thing (that) you need (to) bring is yourself.
- The best thing (that) we can do is (to) forget about it.
- The first thing (that) you have to do is (to) work out how much you need.
We sometimes make a type of cleft sentence with somebody (or someone) or something. I think this is used to emphasise the whole idea rather than a particular part of the sentence.
Somebody, someone
- The headmaster believes strongly in discipline. (subject)
The headmaster is somebody who believes strongly in discipline.
- I trust her implicitly. (object)
She is someone (who) I trust implicitly.
- I find it easy to talk to Pete. (prepositional object)
Pete is somebody (who) I find it eay to talk to.
Something
- This kind of music grows on you. (subject)
This kind of music is something that grows on you.
- I'll never forget my first trip to Vietnam. (object)
My first trip to Vietnam is something (that) I'll never forget.
- I don't want to talk about it. (prepositional object)
It's something (that) I don't want to talk about.
th-clefts
We can make sentences similar to it-clefts but using this, that, these, those.
- But this is Diana (who/that) we're talking about. She's not usually like that.
- Hey, that's my foot (that) you're standing on!
- These are the people who/that have invited us to dinner next week
- Are those my boots that are lying over there?
Note - When we can, we usually leave out the pronoun.
This and that meaning here and there.
This and that are often used in this way to replace here and there
- (On a bus) We get off here
This is where we get off. (OR Here's where we get off.)
- (Pointing) The shop is over there.
That's where the shop is. (OR There's where the shop is.)
The where-clause is a type of nominal relative clause. The next section shows another common type of cleft sentence using nominal relative clause.
th-wh constructions
These are cleft sentences where this / that / these / those + verb be is followed by a nominal relative clause. In these sentences, this, that etc refer back to something that has just been said, or something that you are looking or pointing at or is obvious at the time.
- A: We really need to leave.
- B: That's what I've been saying for the last half-hour!
(= I've been saying for the last half-hour that we need to leave.)
Some more examples:
- A: Bla, bla, bla ... . B: That's what I've been saying all along.
- Bla, bla, bla ... .This is why it's so important you're on time.
- Bla, bla, bla ... .That's how we've been able to stay ahead of the competition.
- Bla, bla, bla ... .This is when good timing is the key to success.
- (looking at something) These are just what I was looking for.
Random Idea English
http://random-idea-english.blogspot.com
Random Idea English
http://random-idea-english.blogspot.com
Related posts
- Read all about it - Introductory it etc
- Nominal relative clauses
- Emphasis with auxiliaries
Links
loading...
-
Read All About It
A look at the various uses of the pronoun it,
introductory (preparatory) it and there,
and it-clefts.
It as a personal pronoun
The basic use of it is as a 3rd person singular personal pronoun, like he / him, she / her, referring to something...
-
Exploring Nominal Relative Clauses, Interrogative Wh-clauses And The Like
One of the more esoteric areas of grammar
The term nominal relative clause is not used very much in TEFL materials, even at advanced level. Nominal relatives and interrogative wh-clauses are usually simply treated together as wh-clauses.
But...
-
Exploring Coordinate Relative Clauses (aka Connective Relative Clauses)
I recently came across this term, which was new to me, in a rather old, but rather good grammar book - Advanced English Practice by BD Graver (Oxford). I can only find one reference to it on the Internet, at the also rather good Polseguera.com,...
-
Q & A When Do We Use That Instead Of Who Or Which?
Basic answer
The who, which and that the question refers to are all relative pronouns.
We can use that instead of who or which in defining (restrictive) relative clauses:
For people:
- The boy who is climbing the tree is my son.
or The...
-
Q & A When Do We Use 'whom' Instead Of 'who'.
I'm tempted to say almost never, but I'll try to be a bit more objective.
Basic answer - in spoken and informal English, most native speakers use whom very rarely. This is because for most of us whom sounds excessively formal and rather old...
Grammar